List Of Figures

Figure Title Page

Figure 1-1 Schematic of an Individual Fuel Cell 1-1

Figure 1-2 Simplified Fuel Cell Schematic 1-2

Figure 1-3 External Reforming and Internal Reforming MCFC System Comparison 1-6

Figure 1-4 Expanded View of a Basic Fuel Cell Repeated Unit in a Fuel Cell Stack 1-8

Figure 1-5 Fuel Cell Power Plant Major Processes 1-9

Figure 1-6 Relative Emissions of PAFC Fuel Cell Power Plants

Compared to Stringent Los Angeles Basin Requirements 1-10

Figure 1-7 PC-25 Fuel Cell 1-14

Figure 1-8 Combining the TSOFC with a Gas Turbine Engine to Improve Efficiency 1-18

Figure 1-9 Overview of Fuel Cell Activities Aimed at APU Applications 1-27

Figure 1-10 Overview of APU Applications 1-27

Figure 1-11 Overview of typical system requirements 1-28

Figure 1-12 Stage of development for fuel cells for APU applications 1-29

Figure 1-13 Overview of subsystems and components for SOFC and PEM systems 1-31

Figure 1-14 Simplified System process flow diagram of pre-reformer/SOFC system 1-32

Figure 1-15 Multilevel system modeling approach 1-33

Figure 1-16 Projected cost structure of a 5kWnet APU SOFC system. Gasoline fueled POX reformer, Fuel cell operating at 300mW/cm2, 0.7 V, 90 % fuel utilization, 500,000 units per year production volume 1-35

Figure 2-1 H2/O2 Fuel Cell Ideal Potential as a Function of Temperature 2-4

Figure 2-2 Ideal and Actual Fuel Cell Voltage/Current Characteristic 2-5

Figure 2-3 Contribution to Polarization of Anode and Cathode 2-8

Figure 2-4 Flexibility of Operating Points According to Cell Parameters 2-9

Figure 2-5 Voltage/Power Relationship 2-10

Figure 2-6 Dependence of the Initial Operating Cell Voltage of Typical Fuel Cells on Temperature 2-12

Figure 2-7 The Variation in the Reversible Cell Voltage as a Function of Reactant

Utilization 2-15

Figure 2-8 Example of a Tafel Plot 2-24

Figure 3-1 PEFC Schematic 3-4

Figure 3-2 Performance of Low Platinum Loading Electrodes 3-5

Figure 3-3 Multi-Cell Stack Performance on Dow Membrane 3-7

Figure 3-4 Effect on PEFC Performances of Bleeding Oxygen into the Anode

Compartment 3-9

Figure 3-5 Evolutionary Changes in PEFCs Performance [(a) H2/O2, (b) Reformate

Figure 3-6 Influence of O2 Pressure on PEFCs Performance (93°C, Electrode

Loadings of 2 mg/cm2 Pt, H2 Fuel at 3 Atmospheres) 3-11

Figure 3-7 Cell Performance with Carbon Monoxide in Reformed Fuel 3-12

Figure 3-8 Single Cell Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Data 3-13

Figure 4-1 Principles of Operation of Alkaline Fuel Cells (Siemens) 4-2

Figure 4-2 Evolutionary Changes in the Performance of AFC's 4-5

Figure 4-3 Reversible Voltage of The Hydrogen-Oxygen Cell 4-6

Figure 4-4 Influence of Temperature on O2, (air) Reduction in 12 N KOH 4-7

Figure 4-5 Influence of Temperature on the AFC Cell Voltage 4-8

Figure 4-6 Degradation in AFC Electrode Potential with CO2 Containing and

CO2 Free Air 4-9

Figure 4-7 iR Free Electrode Performance with O2 and Air in 9 N KOH at 55 to 60oC

Catalyzed (0.5 mg Pt/cm2 Cathode, 0.5 mg Pt-Rh/cm2 Anode) Carbon-based

Porous Electrodes 4-10

Figure 4-8 iR Free Electrode Performance with O2 and Air in 12 N KOH at 65oC 4-11

Figure 5-1 Improvement in the Performance of H2-Rich Fuel/Air PAFCs 5-4

Figure 5-2 Advanced Water-Cooled PAFC Performance 5-6

Figure 5-3 Effect of Temperature: Ultra-High Surface Area Pt Catalyst. Fuel:

H2, H2 + 200 ppm H2S and Simulated Coal Gas 5-12

Figure 5-4 Polarization at Cathode (0.52 mg Pt/cm ) as a Function of O2 Utilization, which is Increased by Decreasing the Flow Rate of the Oxidant at

Atmospheric Pressure 100% H3PO4, 191°C, 300 mA/cm2, 1 atm 5-13

Figure 5-5 Influence of CO and Fuel Gas Composition on the Performance of

Pt Anodes in 100% H3PO4 at 180°C. 10% Pt Supported on Vulcan XC-72, 0.5 mg Pt/cm2. Dew Point, 57°. Curve 1, 100% H2; Curves 2-6,

70% H2 and CO2/CO Contents (mol%) Specified 5-16

Figure 5-6 Effect of H2S Concentration: Ultra-High Surface Area Pt Catalyst 5-17

Figure 5-7 Reference Performances at 8.2 atm and Ambient Pressure 5-20

Figure 6-1 Dynamic Equilibrium in Porous MCFC Cell Elements (Porous electrodes are depicted with pores covered by a thin film of electrolyte) 6-3

Figure 6-2 Progress in the Generic Performance of MCFCs on Reformate

Gas and Air 6-5

Figure 6-3 Effect of Oxidant Gas Composition on MCFC Cathode Performance at 650°C, (Curve 1, 12.6% 02/18.4% C02/69.0% N2; Curve 2, 33% O2/

Figure 6-4 Voltage and Power Output of a 1.0/m2 19 cell MCFC Stack after 960 Hours at 965°C and 1 atm, Fuel Utilization, 75% 6-13

Figure 6-5 Influence of Cell Pressure on the Performance of a 70.5 cm2 MCFC at 650°C (anode gas, not specified; cathode gases, 23.2% O2/3.2% CO2/66.3% N2/7.3% H2O and 9.2% 02/18.2% CO2/65.3% N2/7.3%

H2O; 50% CO2, utilization at 215 mA/cm2) 6-16

Figure 6-6 Influence of Pressure on Voltage Gain 6-17

Figure 6-7 Effect of CO2/O2 Ratio on Cathode Performance in an MCFC, Oxygen

Pressure is 0.15 atm 6-20

Figure 6-8 Influence of Reactant Gas Utilization on the Average Cell Voltage of an MCFC Stack 6-21

Figure 6-9 Dependence of Cell Voltage on Fuel Utilization 6-23

Figure 6-10 Influence of 5 ppm H2S on the Performance of a Bench Scale MCFC

(10 cm x 10 cm) at 650°C, Fuel Gas (10% H2/5% C02/10% H2O/75% He)

at 25% H2 Utilization 6-27

Figure 6-11 IIR/DIR Operating Concept, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Design 6-29

Figure 6-12 CH4 Conversion as a Function of Fuel Utilization in a DIR Fuel Cell (MCFC at 650°C and 1 atm, steam/carbon ratio = 2.0, >99% methane conversion achieved with fuel utilization > 65%) 6-31

Figure 6-13 Voltage Current Characteristics of a 3kW, Five Cell DIR Stack with

5,016 cm2 Cells Operating on 80/20% H2/CO2 and Methane 6-31

Figure 6-14 Performance Data of a 0.37m2 2 kW Internally Reformed MCFC

Stack at 650°C and 1 atm 6-32

Figure 6-15 Average Cell Voltage of a 0.37m2 2 kW Internally Reformed MCFC Stack at 650°C and 1 atm. Fuel, 100% CH4, Oxidant, 12% CO2/9%

Figure 6-16 Model Predicted and Constant Flow Polarization Data Comparison 6-35

Figure 8-1 Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Designs at the Cathode 8-1

Figure 8-2 Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Operating Principle 8-2

Figure 8-3 Cross Section (in the Axial Direction of the +) of an Early Tubular

Configuration for SOFCs 8-8

Figure 8-4 Cross Section (in the Axial Direction of the Series-Connected Cells)

of an Early "Bell and Spigot" Configuration for SOFCs 8-8

Figure 8-5 Cross Section of Present Tubular Configuration for SOFCs 8-9

Figure 8-6 Gas-Manifold Design for a Tubular SOFC 8-9

Figure 8-7 Cell-to-Cell Connections Among Tubular SOFCs 8-10

Figure 8-8 Effect of Pressure on AES Cell Performance at 1000°C 8-14

Figure 8-9 Two Cell Stack Performance with 67% H2 + 22% CO + 11% H2O/Air 8-15

Figure 8-10 Two Cell Stack Performance with 97% H2 and 3% H2O/Air 8-16

Figure 8-17 Cell Performance at 1000°C with Pure Oxygen (o) and Air (A) Both at

25% Utilization (Fuel (67% H2/22% CO/11%H2O) Utilization is 85%) 8-17

Figure 8-12 Influence of Gas Composition of the Theoretical Open-Circuit Potential of

SOFC at 1000°C 8-18

Figure 8-13 Variation in Cell Voltage as a Function of Fuel Utilization and Temperature (Oxidant (o - Pure O2; A - Air) Utilization is 25%. Currently Density is

160 mA/cm2 at 800, 900 and 1000°C and 79 mA/cm2 at 700°C) 8-19

Figure 8-14 SOFC Performance at 1000°C and 350 mA/cm,2 85% Fuel Utilization and 25% Air Utilization (Fuel = Simulated Air-Blown Coal Gas Containing

Figure 8-15 Voltage-Current Characteristics of an AES Cell (1.56 cm Diameter,

50 cm Active Length) 8-21

Figure 9-1 A Rudimentary Fuel Cell Power System Schematic 9-1

Figure 9-2 Representative Fuel Processor Major Componentsa & Temperatures 9-3

Figure 9-3 "Well-to Wheel" Efficiency for Various Vehicle Scenarios 9-8

Figure 9-4 Carbon Deposition Mapping of Methane (CH4) (Carbon-Free

Region to the Right and Above the Curve) 9-23

Figure 9-5 Carbon Deposition Mapping of Octane (C8H18) (Carbon-Free

Region to the Right and Above the Curve) 9-24

Figure 9-6 Optimization Flexibility in a Fuel Cell Power System 9-35

Figure 9-7 Natural Gas Fueled PEFC Power Plant 9-40

Figure 9-8 Natural Gas fueled PAFC Power System 9-42

Figure 9-9 Natural Gas Fueled MCFC Power System 9-44

Figure 9-10 Schematic for a 4.5 MW Pressurized SOFC 9-46

Figure 9-11 Schematic for a 4 MW Solid State Fuel Cell System 9-51

Figure 9-12 Schematic for a 500 MW Class Coal Fueled Pressurized SOFC 9-54

Figure 9-13 Regenerative Brayton Cycle Fuel Cell Power System 9-59

Figure 9-14 Combined Brayton-Rankine Cycle Fuel Cell Power Generation System 9-62

Figure 9-15 Combined Brayton-Rankine Cycle Thermodynamics 9-63

Figure 9-16 T-Q Plot for Heat Recovery Steam Generator (Brayton-Rankine) 9-64

Figure 9-17 Fuel Cell Rankine Cycle Arrangement 9-65

Figure 9-18 T-Q Plot of Heat Recovery from Hot Exhaust Gas 9-66

Figure 9-19 MCFC System Designs 9-71

Figure 9-20 Stacks in Series Approach Reversibility 9-72

Figure 9-21 MCFC Network 9-75

Figure 9-22 Estimated performance of Power Generation Systems 9-78

Figure 9-23 Diagram of a Proposed Siemens-Westinghouse Hybrid System 9-79

Figure11-1 Equilibrium Constants (Partial Pressures in MPa) for (a) Water Gas Shift, (b) Methane Formation, (c) Carbon Deposition (Boudouard Reaction), and (d) Methane Decomposition (J.R. Rostrup-Nielsen, in Catalysis Science and Technology, Edited by J.R. Anderson and M. Boudart, Springer-Verlag, Berlin GDR, p.1, 1984.) 11-2

Solar Panel Basics

Solar Panel Basics

Global warming is a huge problem which will significantly affect every country in the world. Many people all over the world are trying to do whatever they can to help combat the effects of global warming. One of the ways that people can fight global warming is to reduce their dependence on non-renewable energy sources like oil and petroleum based products.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment